U.S. Army soldier launches AeroVironment's Puma unmanned aerial vehicle during an Iraqi security forces' offensive on an ISIS position near the western edge of Mosul, Iraq, March 19, 2017. Source: Army/Staff Sgt. Jason Hull
CNBC: ISIS fight shows US military can use lower-cost weapons with lethal results
* The fight against the Islamic State is seen as a learning opportunity for the U.S. military as it looks to a future of a new kind of opponent in urban settings.
* Low-cost solutions, whether in precision weapons or lighter attack aircraft, provide advantages in an era of constrained budgets.
* Anti-UAV technology in demand as enemy develops more weaponized uses for drones.
The fight against the Islamic State has become a learning opportunity for the U.S. military as it looks to a future taking on very adaptable and resourceful opponents.
There's also a growing realization that lower-cost technology solutions, whether in precision weapons or lighter attack aircraft, can provide advantages in an era of constrained budgets.
"What we've discovered is we're using very expensive stuff like B-1s, F-22s and even MQ-9 Reapers with things like Hellfire missiles, when you can do a lot of this with cheaper aircraft," said Daniel Goure, a defense analyst and vice president of the Lexington Institute, a nonprofit public policy research organization based in Arlington, Virginia.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Why is a $60,000 missile being used when an artillery round can do the same job. Why send in a B-1 bomber when a Hell-Fire missile fired from a drone can be used. But the big question is .... will the military change its ways. If the past is any indication .... we should not be optimistic.