But first, don't feed the trolls. Basic rule of the internet, and life. Unfortunately, America has elected the worst troll in history as President. Now what?
"Pocahontas." What was the proper response? Donald Trump is a troll. No matter what, he's going to keep calling her "Pocahontas," because he's a troll, and it's a laugh line for his base. And anyone who thought there was the slightest chance he'd cough up that $1 million is as dumb as the idiots who enrolled in Trump University. And those people were stupid. So, suppose 2020 is Trump versus "Pocahontas." How does that play out?
If the economy tanks, Trump loses. Why? DNA test or no, he just comes across like he's lashing out because he hates losing. Which would be true. If the economy chugs along the way it is now, then even with the DNA test backing up Warren's family lore, he can call her "Pocahontas" on the debate stage, and the more she protests, the more it looks like she's whining about personal offense because she's got nothin' else.
Of course, unlike a Jedi, no president, especially not Trump, can really control the economy, hence the "weak-minded" observation. Presidents matter, economically, in times of crisis, and Trump hasn't had an economic crisis. The trade crisis that he is creating is still in its early stages, and that won't tank the economy by 2020. Trump inherited a growing economy and is taking credit for it. That's kind of his specialty, in case you hadn't noticed.
If the economy keeps on like this and the Democrats nominate Kamala Harris, Trump could stand there on the debate stage, call her the n-word, call her the c-word, then call her an "uppity little bitch," order the Secret Service to bitch-slap her, and then tell her to go back to cleaning his house. He'd still win.
"Pocahontas?" That might as well be Elizabeth Warren's name, now and forever. In a bad economy, it does no damage, and in a good economy, there is no way to overcome it.