At least when the teabaggers removed Boehner, they had a case to make against him. It was a stupid case, but it was a case. They thought that he wasn't confrontational enough, and that a more aggressive approach would yield more. They thought he was a sell-out because they didn't understand institutional constraints, and they didn't like the fact that they weren't getting the results they expected. It was an uninformed case, but it was a policy-based case.
What have we learned? The anti-Pelosi Democrats are dumber than the Tea Party. Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you... the Democratic Party.
Previous post on Pelosi versus Fudge.
Previous post on Democratic leadership contests.